Contact us




Kate's Fake Pregnancy - Part 2

July 8 , 2013



Part 1 of this 2 part series contends that Kate, like many women in the entertainment industry, hired a "surrogate" to avoid the morning sickness, weight gain, swollen ankles and breasts, bladder discomfort, labour, pain and stretch marks of pregnancy. She hired a surrogate to escape the havoc that pregnancy would wreak on her shapely, underweight body and her fashionable royal lifestyle.

Part 1 also contends that when Kate was admitted to hospital between December 3 and December 6, 2012, she wasn't admitted for morning sickness since medical staff at the royal estate could have easily treated her condition. She was admitted to the hospital for egg removal surgery and "in vitrio" fertilization. The royal couple's embryo was then implanted in a hired surrogate.

To cover up the scandalous use of a surrogate, Kate has been wearing a silicone pregnancy belly for photo ops which are available in 3, 6 and 9 month sizes.

Part 1 of this 2 part series also contends that the nurse who allegedly committed suicide during Kate's hospital stay was murdered when she learned Kate wasn't really pregnant.

See Part One at http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news825_kate.html



Photos of Kate posing in high heels do not reveal any of the typical signs of water retention during advanced pregnancy such as facial fullness/puffiness or breast, ankle and feet swelling. She looks just as slender and comfortable in heels as non-pregnant Kate.

Pregnant women are advised by doctors never to wear high heels in the third trimester due to balance, back and swelling issues...so why is Kate wearing high heels and looking very unpregnant (besides the fake silicone bulge)?


If Kate and William's baby was conceived "in vitrio" during Kate's hospital stay between December 3 and December 6, 2012, the baby is not due to be delivered by the surrogate until early September, 2013.

Since the public has been deceived into believing that Kate was 4 to 8 weeks pregnant during her "fake" morning sickness stay in the hospital, the public expects her to give birth in July.

That means the "July" birth will have to be faked and a substitute "photo op" baby or babies if it is "twins" will be used for publicity purposes until Kate and William's "real" baby or babies (twins) arrives in early September.


How can Kate, William and royal insiders possibly get away with faking the birth of a baby or twins by "unpregnant" Kate? What about the hospital and medical staff who will confirm the birth(s) and be interviewed by the media?

Officially, the palace has confirmed that once the birth has occurred and has been overseen by the medical staff attached to the Queen's royal household, a letter signed by senior doctors Marcus Setchell and Alan Farthing will be mounted on a wooden easel and displayed close to the gates of the palace for the public to view.

The easel announcement will reveal whether the baby is female (Her Royal Highness Princess of Cambridge) or male (His Royal Highness Prince of Cambridge) or both.

When the birth statistics are made public and announced by the palace, they will be the "official and publicly accepted" statistics...but they will be false statistics. Why? Because Kate was never pregnant in the first place. Kate and William's baby or twins will be delivered by the surrogate(s) in secrecy around September 5th.

In July, there will be photo ops and an avalanche of hype and deceptive media reports showing Kate and William posing with a "substitute" baby or babies (twins) in their arms instead of their yet unborn "real" baby or babies. Until the "real" baby or babies arrive in early September, the world will be fooled into fawning over the substitute "photo op" baby or babies just like they were fooled over Kate's fake pregnancy.


Royal watchers expect the birth announcement to come on July 13 (7/13/13 = Masonic 33) when the car departs from the hospital escorted by the Metropolitan police or when the easel is placed in the forecourt of the palace.

The centuries' old tradition that the Home Secretary must be present at a royal birth will be waived for the birth of William & Kate's baby. WHAT? Why has the Home secretary's presence been waived for this royal birth??? Is it because the royals don't want the Home Secretary participating in the baby birth charade?

The first person to be officially notified of the "fake" birth(s) will be the Queen, who is expected to be told in person.

It is unknown which members, if any, of the Middleton-Goldsmith family will be at the hospital when the Duchess goes into (fake) labour.

In other words, the only scammers involved in the royal birth deception are William, Kate, the royal family, Kate's parents and the two baby doctors.

Kate's baby doctors are Alan Farthing and Marcus Setchell.


Kate's baby doctor, Alan Farthing, is at the center of one of Britain's most notorious murder scandals. Jill Dando was Dr. Farthing's fiance and she was also a popular BBC news anchor and host when she was shot dead in 1999.

According to police reports, Jill Dando, left Dr. Farthing’s home in the morning to go shopping. When she returned to her London home, she was fatally shot on the front steps. A scream was heard by witnesses but no shots were heard.

Rumors started circulating that Dr. Farthing may have had a hand in his fiance's murder...but they were ignored.

Instead of investigating Dr. Farthing for the murder, the police focused their investigation on another man, Barry George, who was falsely convicted of the murder and sentenced to life in prison. In 2008, his conviction was overturned on appeal and Barry George was acquitted after spending seven years in jail for a murder he didn't commit.

One of Britain’s most notorious murder cases - the murder of Dr. Farthing's fiance - is once again an "unsolved" murder. It is a well known fact that 80% of killers are known to their victim.


What could Dr. Farthing's motive have been for murdering his fiance, Jill Dando? Dr. Farthing became engaged to the popular TV host who was like the “British Katie Couric”. Just five months before the planned wedding, Jill was shot dead in broad daylight.

Jill Dando was allegedly investigating a paedophile ring linked to Jimmy Savile, to the BBC and to other VIP's including politicians, judges, royals and doctors. One of Jill's friends was named and after she asked him about it, she was shot. Was that friend Dr. Alan Farthing? Did Jill Dando confront her fiance about his connection to the paedophile ring?

The trail leads to the Elm House child sexual abuse scandal in Rocks Lane and to another death. The one-time owner, Carole Kasir, who couldn't "keep her trap shut", was also silenced under suspicious circumstances.

According to a royal insider, the royal family is aware of Dr. Farthing's questionable past. He became Queen Elizabeth’s personal gynecologist in 2008 around the same time that the man convicted of murdering Farthing's fiance was acquitted.

Farthing will never face murder charges or life in prison for the unsolved murder. Why? Because he will do and say whatever he is told to do and say so that the fictitious royal birth in mid-July is sold to the public without a glitch.

But what about Kate's other baby doctor - Marcus Setchell? Would he be willing to cooperate with the royal birth charade?


Marcus Setchell took over as the Queen's surgeon-gynaecologist in 1990. In 2005, the Queen made him the Knight Commander of the Royal Victorian Order.

The British Royal family have always been steeped in Freemasonry through their own orders like the Knights of the Garter, the Order of the Thistle, the Order of St John of Jerusalem (Knights of Malta) and the Royal Victorian Order. All of them interlock with the Freemasonic networks.


Marcus Setchell, the Queen's 66 year old doctor of 18 years is now Kate's baby doctor even though he is presently being sued by a former patient in High Court for over £300,000 (half a million dollars) for medical malpractice and clinical negligence.

Anu Dhir and Sanjai Malaviya are seeking damages and costs "arising from the wrongful birth of their daughter", Aariya Malaviya. The couple, from Chelsea, in West London, claim that the "wrongful birth" was due to the "negligence and breach of contract" of Setchell, who was treating Mrs. Dhir as a private patient during a seven-month period two years ago.

In 2008, it was announced that Alan Farthing, the fiancé of the murdered BBC television host Jill Dando, was to succeed Setchell. Will the British High Courts find Setchell guilty of medical malpractice and clinical negligence. Nope. Like Farthing, Commander Setchell of the Royal Victorian Order will do and say whatever he is told to do and say so that the fictitious royal birth in mid-July is sold to the public without a glitch.

Would you want Setchell or Farthing to deliver your baby? That's not something Kate or William have to worry about since neither of these doctors will be delivering anything except fake delivery news.


Kate has told her friends she will be living with her parents for a least six weeks after giving (false) birth at the hospital, the Daily Mail reports. The Duchess has also decided not to hire a maternity nurse. What? No maternity nurse? Of course not. Why? Because there's no need for one!

William and Kate's plans to move into their apartment at Kensington Palace came to a halt because of a lame excuse about finding asbestos in the home. As multi-millionaire Prince William pretends to return to work as a helicopter rescue pilot, Kate will need a place to stay with tons a privacy while raising their "photo op"baby or twins...and awaiting the birth of their "real" baby or babies by surrogate(s).

Kate will be staying with her parents in the family's new 7 million dollar home that they bought with their savings from their children's party business. Uh huh. Kate wants to be around people that she can trust (with her surrogate secret).

A source told the Daily Mail that "Kate just feels safest and most secure when she’s with her family.” But, isn't William her family? What's she doing moving back in with her parents? Why isn't William around to participate as a parent?


The Queen's mother, Elizabeth Bowes Lyon, was the born from a surrogate. The surrogate was the family’s French cook - Marguerite Rodiere. This explains the unflattering nickname ‘Cookie’ given to the Queen Mother.

The Queen Mother's exact date of birth in August 1900 as the fourth daughter of Lord Glamis has always been disputed. It remains unclear whether she was born in the back of a London ambulance or the family home.

Another puzzle is why the Queen Mother, born the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes Lyon, was given a French middle name. Elizabeth’s secret was not so secret in aristocratic and royal circles.



For those who think this 2 part series is focusing on tabloid trivia instead of the really big stories like Syria, Egypt, Snowden and the NDAA, think again. These articles are about raising the veil on royal deception. Until that veil is raised and the massive royal deception is exposed, then trying to make sense out of world politics is futile.

The British royal family and their bankster entourage are the criminal 1% who rule the 1% who rule the 99%. Their power and wealth has been built on the drug trade, slave trade, arms trade, insider trading, tax free corporate investments, genocidal wars, looting, environmental exploitation and ceremonial deception. It continues to this day.

Learn more: http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/DVD-King.html

If you like this site, visit our STORE and forward our link to friends.



Your smallest donation helps. Thank you!