newsheadlines

Wikileaks Disinfo

28-7-2010 @ 10:59 PM by antonia

I'm quite sure I will get a lot of hate mail for this but, here I go.

I think we all might want to consider the validity of Wikileaks as a "wistleblower" outlet. There are some serious issues with the project. The most glaring problem? The lack of security for it's informants. Both the source for the leaked documents and the massacre video were arrested after the leak. Both of these sources were outed by hackers.

Wikileaks does a very poor job of protecting it's sources. Is this on purpose? There is little known on Assange, but it is known he was part of a computer hacker group know as the Chaos Computer Club back in the 80's according to Wayne Madsen and others. He has lied about his background continually. His degrees appear to come from diploma mills according to some sources.

Are we looking at a CIA patsy (plant)?

Think about it, the documents leaked really weren't that important. If you read the paper you pretty much knew everything contained in those documents. There is also the strange combo of papers, all with heavy ties to the government. As for this being some kind of surprise to the White House, well that doesn't make much sense as the New York Times indicates it ASKED if it was ok to publish the documents. There are also issues with authenticating all of the documents as there are no paper copies.

Then you have the spin on the stories themselves. They seem to single out Iran and Pakistan. It almost seems like this is perfectly timed to start pointing fingers at a new enemy at the tail end of the CFR faction saying the war in Afghanistan is a failure.

Which leads to the point: Maybe Wikileaks is simply a disinfo outlet. They give out small amounts of good info and then put out documents to attack who they are made to. Their board is populated with hackers who seem tied to the Soros/left wing faction. Interestingly, Soros got in a spat with a certain congressman who had all his campaign contributions published on Wikileaks shortly after the spat.

So, I ask: Is it possible we are all being duped by Wikileaks

28-7-2010 by airspoon

I don't trust wikileaks at all. Something just doesn't seem right and my gut feeling is usually always correct. With that being said, it's not only my gut feeling. For instance, Assange shouldn't be that hard for officials to find and if American authorities were looking for him, as we were led to believe, they could easily just pick him as soon as he crossed a border somewhere. He could have been picked up when he went on Colbert.

In my opinion, he is just a propaganda tool for the CIA and maybe other western intelligence agancies. Something isn't right and the stench is coming from both Assange and wikileaks.